• Login
  • Home
 
 
  • VISIT OUR PAC SITE
  • TAKE ACTION!
  • PREGNANT?
    • Need Help?
    • Abortion Changes You
    • Abortion Alternatives
    • Additional Services
    • Post Abortive Services
    • Your Right to Know
    • When Does Life Begin?
    • Safe Place for Newborns Law
  • Home
  • Login
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • MCCL policy
      • About privacy
      • About violence
      • About links
      • About other groups
    • History of MCCL
    • Help wanted
    • Contact us
    • NRLC affiliates
    • Specialty groups
    • Site map
  • Help us
    • Make a donation
      • Donate to MCCL
      • Recurring gifts
      • Memorials and tributes
      • Planned giving
      • More options
      • Where does my money go?
    • Volunteer time and talent
    • Become a member
  • News
    • News release index
    • MCCL News online
    • NRL News Today
    • LifeNews.com
    • RSS News Feed
  • Life issues
    • The unborn's development
      • When does life begin?
      • Prenatal surgery
    • Abortion
      • Abortion hurts women
      • Women Share their stories
      • Abortion 101
      • Forced abortions
      • Saline abortions
      • Sex-selection abortion
      • RU486 abortions
      • Fetal Pain
        • Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act
        • During an abortion
        • Congressional testimony
      • Partial-birth abortions
        • Banned by Congress
        • Gonzales v. Carhart
      • MN abortion report (MDH)
      • MN informed consent booklet (WRTK)
      • Help for Women
        • Pregnant? Need help?
        • Additional pregnancy services
        • Positive Alternatives
        • Safe Place for Newborns
        • Woman's Right to Know
        • When does life begin?
      • U.S. abortion statistics
      • MN abortion statistics
      • When courts legislate
    • About Planned Parenthood
    • Abortion alternatives
    • Euthanasia
      • End-of-life issues
      • Get your own Will to Live
      • Protecting disabled infants
      • Assisted suicide
    • Health care
      • Health care "reform" resources
      • Universal health care
      • Interview: U.S/Canadian health care
      • Why pro-lifers care
      • Health care without rationing
      • The "Death Book"
      • Hyde Amendment and ObamaCare
    • Stem cells and cloning
      • Embryonic stem cells
        • Embryonic stem cell basics
        • Human egg harvesting
      • Adult stem cells
        • Successes and benefits
      • Stem cells from cord blood
      • ESCR v. ASCR
      • Cloning basics
      • Reproductive vs. "therapeutic" cloning
      • How to clone
  • Resources
    • New Resources
    • Resource directory
    • Pro-life curriculum
    • MCCL Petition
    • Post abortive services
    • Our lending library
    • MCCL's billboards
    • MCCL blog
  • Legislation
    • State legislation
      • MCCL's legislative agenda and bill tracking
      • Legislative victories
        • Positive Alternatives
        • Unborn Child Pain Prevention Act
        • Woman's Right to Know
        • MCCL's legislative victories
      • MCCL's legislative history
      • How your lawmaker voted
    • Federal legislation
      • NRLC Legislative Action Center
      • NRLC's Web site
    • Contacting lawmakers
      • Tips for contacting lawmakers
      • Lawmakers' contact information
  • Student commons
    • Listen to the beat!
    • College students
      • MCCL's Facebook group
      • Campus-based groups
      • Student manual
      • Internships
      • How you can help us
      • Let us help you
      • Contact Us
    • High school students
      • MCCL's Facebook group
      • Things you can do
      • Pro-life curriculum
      • Let us help you
      • Student Day at the Capitol
      • Oratory Contest
      • Contact us
      • Student manual
    • Jr high students/parents
      • Student Day at the Capitol
      • Recommended reading
      • Prenatal development
      • Abortion speech
    • Elementary students/parents
      • Pro-life coloring book
      • Recommended reading
      • First days photo album
  • Events
    • March for Life
    • Legislative Dinner
    • Student Day at the Capitol
    • Oratory Contest
    • Mother's Day observance
    • Father's Day observance
    • Fall Tour
    • State Fair
    • County fairs
    • Life Leadership Camp
You can make a difference
Donate Now

Join our online Community


Community members will have expanded access to our site and can optionally receive communications not available to non-community members. 

There is no charge, you just need to establish a login.

Current MCCL members will have even greater access when they login.  Not a MCCL member?  No problem. See our Become a Member page to learn more.

 

See something you like?
We accept tips!




The real debate:  ESCR funding

The political debate regarding federal funding of ESCR

Embryonic stem cell research began over twenty years ago when the first embryonic stem cells (ESCs) were isolated from mice. Scientists claimed that unprecedented advances would result from this discovery. Since then, large sources of funding were sought from both private and public sources. After the first human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) were isolated in 1999, scientists became even more demanding.

Federal funds may not be spent on any hESC lines that result in the death of new human life after August 19, 2001. As with every scientific advancement, it is vitally important that our Government ensure that the policies we fund are not only clinically effective, but most importantly, morally sound.

In an attempt to respect the sanctity of human life-even at its earliest stages and also allow for scientific study, President Bush struck a compromise that would allow federal funding on hESC lines that were created prior to August 19, 2001.

This is a very important decision should not be seen as a rejection of science, or disrespect for human life. In fact, it is quite the opposite. In order to ensure that there would be no incentives for future destruction of human life simply for research, federal funds may not be spent on any hESC lines that result in the death of new human life after August 19, 2001. At the same time, successful adult stem cell research is still eligible for federal funding.

Science is not being rejected, it is just given ethical parameters within which to operate. Tax payers should not be forced to pay for research that destroys human life.

Congress has repeatedly sought federal funding for ineffective and destructive ESCR. Fortunately, President Bush has continued to veto those attempts while making it clear that he supports successful adult stem cell research. To review some of the alternatives his office is advancing, please look at the Presidential Report from January 2007, Advancing Stem Cell Research without Destroying Human Life.Science is not being rejected, it is just given ethical parameters within which to operate.

Private Funding becoming scarce

President Bush is not alone in recognizing the ineffectiveness of hESCR. Even private companies are pulling back from investing money in hESCR. Clinical trials with hESCR are decades away at best and therefore not a profitable investment for businesses.

William Haseltine, CEO of Human Genome Sciences, Inc., of Rockville, Maryland, made an interesting statement in this regard, despite the fact that he advocates heavily for ESCR. He said, "The routine utilization of human embryonic stem cells for medicine is 20 to 30 years hence. The timeline to commercialization is so long that I simply would not invest." Willaim Haseltine, CEO of Human Genome Science, Inc "The routine utilization of human embryonic stem cells for medicine is 20 to 30 years hence. The timeline to commercialization is so long that I simply would not invest.You may notice that our company has not made such investments."

Despite the fact that this research is decades away, there are still a number of non-profit organizations that are advocating for hESCR, in particular the Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research. We urge you to let these organizations know that you oppose their support for destructive ineffective research.


New Battle Ground: State Legislatures

While we can be grateful that President Bush has held the line in stopping federal funding for destructive ESCR, taxpayers are still being bullied into paying for this ineffective and unethical research.

Several states have bowed to the pressure of scientist to fund hESCR to the tune of millions of dollars.

Fortunately, Minnesota has not yet given in to this unethical demand, but there are aggressive attempts to allow state tax dollars to fund destructive ESCR at the University of Minnesota.

Scientists at the university are not shy in expressing their intentions. In testimony before a State Senate Committee, Dr. Meri Firpo, who has developed several hESC lines from embryos she has personally destroyed, testified that she wants state funding for her research so she can spend more time in the lab and less time trying to raise money. Wouldn't it be nice if we could all ask the Government to pick up the tab for us to do what we want!

To date pro-lifers have been successful in stopping efforts to allow state funding for ESCR at the U, but this battle continues. Please let your legislators know that you oppose this research.

 
 

All Rights Reserved ©2014 - 2015
Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life
4249 Nicollet Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55409
Phone: 612.825.6831 | Fax: 612.825.5527

  • Support
  • |
  • Site Map
  • |
  • Events
  • |
  • |
  • Legislation
  • |
  • Current Issues
  • |
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About
Follow us on your favorite social network MCCL Facebook MCCL's Twitter pinterest MCCL blog MCCL's RSS Feed